AI regulations your organization needs to understand
The AI regulatory landscape is evolving fast. This guide covers every major AI law and framework — what it requires, who it affects, and how TRAIGA helps your organization meet each obligation.
Six AI regulations. One platform to cover them all.
TRAIGA maps your controls to every applicable framework simultaneously — so you document once and satisfy multiple regulatory obligations without duplicating effort.
Texas Responsible AI Governance Act
Texas, USA
The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act requires covered organizations to maintain an AI system inventory, conduct risk assessments, implement controls, generate public disclosures for high-risk systems, and produce board-level governance reports. The most comprehensive state AI governance law in the United States.
Key obligations
AI system inventory, risk assessment, public disclosures, human oversight documentation, and board reporting for covered entities operating in Texas.
Who's affected
Organizations operating in Texas that deploy AI systems in consequential decisions affecting Texas residents — including healthcare, financial services, hiring, insurance, and government.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act
European Union
The world's first comprehensive AI regulation, the EU AI Act classifies AI systems into risk tiers — prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk, and minimal-risk — and imposes proportionate obligations on providers and deployers. High-risk AI systems require technical documentation, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and transparency obligations.
Key obligations
Risk tier classification, technical documentation, conformity assessment, human oversight for high-risk systems, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration.
Who's affected
Any organization providing or deploying AI systems in the European Union — including organizations outside the EU whose AI systems affect EU residents.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework
United States (Federal)
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework is a voluntary but widely adopted guidance document that organizes AI risk management into four functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. It has become the de facto reference standard for AI governance programs in the US and is explicitly referenced by multiple state AI laws.
Key obligations
Structured AI risk management across four functions: Govern (policies and accountability), Map (context and risk identification), Measure (risk analysis), and Manage (risk response and monitoring).
Who's affected
Any organization seeking a structured approach to AI risk management. Federal agencies are increasingly required to align with NIST AI RMF, and it is commonly referenced by state AI regulations including TRAIGA.
ISO 42001 AI Management Systems
International
ISO/IEC 42001 is the international standard for AI management systems. It provides a framework for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an AI management system — similar to ISO 27001 for information security. Certification is available and increasingly expected by enterprise customers and regulators.
Key obligations
AI management system requirements covering context, leadership, planning, support, operations, performance evaluation, and continual improvement.
Who's affected
Organizations seeking third-party certification of their AI management program. Particularly relevant for AI providers serving regulated industries, government customers, or EU markets under the EU AI Act.
California AI Legislation
California, USA
California has introduced and is advancing multiple AI bills, including provisions covering AI system transparency, automated decision-making disclosure, and frontier AI safety requirements. California's regulatory activity is likely to produce some of the most significant state AI laws after TRAIGA.
Key obligations
Transparency disclosures for automated decision-making, safety requirements for frontier AI systems, and documentation obligations for high-risk AI applications. Specific requirements depend on the applicable bill.
Who's affected
Organizations deploying AI systems in California or making decisions that affect California residents. The world's fifth-largest economy means nearly every large enterprise faces potential California AI exposure.
Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act
Colorado, USA
The Colorado AI Act imposes consumer protection requirements on developers and deployers of 'high-risk artificial intelligence systems' used in consequential decisions. It requires algorithmic impact assessments, annual disclosure statements, and notification to consumers before high-risk AI is used in decisions affecting them.
Key obligations
Algorithmic impact assessments for high-risk AI systems, annual public disclosure statements, consumer notification before use of high-risk AI, and anti-discrimination safeguards.
Who's affected
Developers and deployers of AI systems used in consequential decisions — including employment, education, financial services, healthcare, housing, insurance, and legal services — affecting Colorado residents.
How the regulations compare
Different frameworks impose different obligations. TRAIGA maps your controls against every framework simultaneously — so you can see exactly where gaps exist and what needs to be addressed.
| Obligation | Texas TRAIGA | EU AI Act | NIST AI RMF | ISO 42001 | California AI | Colorado AI Act |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI system inventory | ||||||
| Risk assessment | ||||||
| Public disclosures | ||||||
| Human oversight documentation | ||||||
| Bias / fairness testing | ||||||
| Incident reporting | ||||||
| Board / executive accountability | ||||||
| Technical documentation | ||||||
| Third-party audit / conformity | ||||||
| Annual impact assessment |
TRAIGA maps your controls to all six frameworks simultaneously. See how the platform works →
Stop tracking AI regulations in a spreadsheet
TRAIGA maps your AI systems to every applicable regulation — TRAIGA, EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, California AI, and Colorado AI Act — from a single platform. Start free, first AI system inventoried in under 10 minutes.
Six AI frameworks mapped in one system
Implement controls once, satisfy all frameworks
Board reports ready in minutes, not weeks